Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

NINJA'S NEEDED!! (cue eye roll)

Attention Employers! It's a buyers market. Over the course of the last 18-24 months software engineer Supply / Demand reports are showing approximately three open positions for every one qualified job seeker.
If I told you we were hiring JavaScript Ninjas would you think any less of me? Don't answer that. See, I'm not looking for "Rock Stars," "Warlocks" or a "Code Monkey" either.
Attracting top talent takes more than posting an extensive laundry list of required skills or using clever words and phrases to appear "hip."
What if I told you I simply need a solid client-side developer who can come up with elegant front-end solutions? You'll be given autonomy to make decisions, work with some reasonably talented and friendly human beings, and be treated & compensated fairly. Sound reasonable?
The methods recruiters (both corporate and agency) are using to engage with technical professionals need to change. Job descriptions should be descriptive of the job not a generic list of skills that you won't find combined in one person.
Here's what top talent wants to see in a job description:
  • A decent picture of the day-to-day roles and responsibilities. They understand they'll be slinging code and running unit tests. They also understand there likely will be some production babysitting. They're looking for the FUN stuff like researching and deploying new technology along with being an integrated member of the solution development & delivery team. Coding existing technical requirements is part of every software engineer's job, but if that's all they're going to do reference "code monkey" and make sure your day-to-day picture looks like that. (Note: this will likely negatively impact the number of applicants.)
  • What kind of people will they be working with on a regular basis? What's the team make-up? Who inside and outside the organization will be influencing and impacting their work on a daily basis? Is there a mentor? Is there someone there TO mentor?
  • What the company offers in terms of culture, benefits, and opportunities for growth. Ultimately they want to know why it's a great place to work and what might set you apart from the other two employers who are competing for their services.
  • How much money the employer expects to pay for the right person. They'd also like to know the non-monetary reasons to consider the job if the money is on the low side of the scale.
  • Some core technical expectations without running down the litany of every piece of technology and third party vendor currently residing in your data center.
What top talent doesn't want to see is qualifications listing "a minimum of five years experience in XYZ" or a demand for "excellent organization, communication, and/or people skills."
They also don't want to see jobs that don't pay a fair market wage. A recent senior .NET developer posting in Kansas City touted "TOP PAY $" yet listed pay range is $25,000less than average compensation level and $35,000 less than what empirical data from a number of reliable sources indicates.
The data tells me the senior .NET developer you are so desperately trying to attract to your team is currently making anywhere from $90k - $120k annually. An advertised $65 - $85k range represents a significant cut in pay which will only attract unqualified applicants or no applicants at all.
PS: I didn't run the numbers on a ninja, but I'm certain that will be higher.
Software professionals are smart buyers so talent acquisition professionals need to be savvy marketers.
PPS: I seriously am hiring a couple solid client-side developers to build elegant front-end solutions who will be given autonomy to make decisions, work with some reasonably talented and friendly human beings, and be treated & compensated fairly.

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Online Consumer Review Sites

Everyone has an opinion. With so many voices wanting to be heard in today's hyper-connected and information saturated world, it's no mystery why online review sites have become so popular. 

Google's review platform allows you to share your opinion on any product or service in a Google search result. Interested in researching a company? Glassdoor, Yahoo, and others offer options. Traveling or looking for a new place to have a nice meal? Check out Yelp or TripAdvisor. You can even check out reviews for a gallon of milk on Amazon

If you clicked on the link to the milk reviews you saw the humor of some online reviewers. However, reviews don't have to be absurd to be viewed with skepticism. There certainly are pro's and con's to using online reviews as a source of information.

The Pro's:

Accessibility to Information. Before Al Gore invented the internet there were a handful of print publication that provided this type of information Today that has all changed. Before we step foot in a business we have an opportunity to form an opinion based on "word-of-mouth" ("word of internet?") information.

Positive Reviews drive business. Yes, I check out Yelp before I try someplace new. The places that"delight their customers" have been rewarded with new customers. However, there's another edge to this sword - if the reviews are consistently 4+ stars I also go in with high expectations. 

The Business can improve and/or make amends. A negative review gives a company a chance to learn from mistakes and provides an opportunity to reach out to an unsatisfied customer to rectify a situation. 

Global Impact. If you're unfamiliar with a city you plan to visit or live in this information can impact many decisions you need to make. Online review sites expose businesses to an audience beyond their immediate neighborhood.

The Cons's:

Michael Scott (Dunder Mifflen Regional Manager) once said "Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject, so you know you are getting the best possible information." Review sites are no different than the rest of the intrawebs - everything must be read with a critical eye. Just because it's written doesn't make it real.

Focusing on the Negative. You know the old adage "if you like something you'll tell one person, if you don't like it you'll tell ten." As authors review sites give us a forum to vent our frustrations. As readers we like "the dirt." Expect negative reviews - you can't please everyone.

Dated Reviews. Our world moves at a fast pace so reviews have a fairly short shelf life. The positive or negative experience from two or three years ago very well may be a completely different story today.

Anonymity. If you so choose, you can remain anonymous on every review site. In some cases (such as Glassdoor) nearly every review is anonymous. If you have an ax to grind there are no consequences for providing  misleading or false information.

If you post nothing but negative reviews your credibility as a reviewer is in question. Make sure you're singing the praises of the organizations that get it right as much (if not more) than the ones that get it wrong. 

Conclusion

As a consumer be discerning about available information. Reviews often are born from a strong opinion or experience so the number of reviews should be considered. Look for trends in the reviews. Is the majority singing their praises or complaining? 

Above all, formulate your own opinions and check things out with an open mind. Make decisions based on your experience, not on opinions and experiences of people you'll never meet.